Your Ad Here

Bwheel : Give Your Car a Bit of Finesse With Windshield Decals

Saturday, May 29, 2010

Ajeet Khurana

Windshield decals are those strips of decoration or wording at the top of the windshield you see on those cool cars going down the road. You know just what these decals do for the car; they actually give the car a bit of finesse or pizzazz that is certainly not a factory add-on.

You can of course find decals with the name of your car in all kinds of fonts, colors, and styles, but if you want something besides Camaro or Silverado on the windshield, just use your imagination. You can decals already created with wording such as princess, caught you looking, baby girl, and intimidator, to name a few. However, you do not have to choose a ready-made decal.

Today, you can find a graphic designer that will create a windshield decal with your preferences. The only thing is you have to ensure the size that will fit your vehicle without obstructing your view, or you may find yourself with a hefty traffic ticket. You can choose from wording, tribal designs, animals, or whatever you desire and have the design created into windshield decals for all your vehicles.

Once you have chosen your design, your designer will be able to create the decal. Of course, that is not all; you will need to know if you want a removable decal, a static cling decal, or if you prefer a permanent decal. All of these questions will need to be answered before you can receive the decal of your choice. If you want a decal that you can remove, this has to be explained to the designer. If you want a permanent decal, the decal has to be weather proof or you will be spending money for a decal that will fade away.

You know you want to add a decal to your windshield. Now, just start looking online for the various decals available, you may wish to have your windshield decal match decals you wish to put on the rear window. No matter, what you desire, your dream of sprucing up your car can be a reality with a decal for the windshield. The good news is you can get decals that are see-through which is really awesome. It gives you the look you want while allowing you to see through your windshield with no problem. Have fun shopping for the decals you want to give your car or truck personality. Don't worry all of your friends will be envious.
READ MORE - Bwheel : Give Your Car a Bit of Finesse With Windshield Decals

Bwheel : The easy way to save on auto insurance

Friday, May 28, 2010


Auto insurance is a big chunk of your monthly budget, but shopping around to find a good policy price can be incredibly time consuming.

Fortunately, the Internet has sites that do the hard work for you. For example, www.freeinsurancerates.org is a free and easy way to learn your auto insurance options so you can get the best price for your policy in much less time.

Compare quotes quickly and easily

You can't know you're getting the lowest rate for auto insurance unless you compare multiple quotes. When you visit www.freeinsurancerates.org, you'll fill out basic information about your insurance needs and auto history.

Within a matter of minutes you'll be connected to a variety of auto insurance companies who can give you quotes directly. If you have any questions, agents are there to help. Compare prices on similar policies and choose the right price for you.

The service is completely free and there is no obligation to buy. Your personal information is kept safe and confidential at all times and will only be used to find the best insurance quotes for you.

Remember to about special discounts as this is another way to save even more money.

Here are some examples of discounts often offered by auto insurance carriers:

* Safe driver discounts for drivers with few accidents or violations.
* Good student discounts for students with high GPAs.
* Low mileage discounts for drivers who drive minimal mileage each year.
* Anti-theft discounts for cars with anti-theft devices installed.
* Good credit score discounts for drivers with high credit scores.
* Safe car discounts for cars with safety features such as air bags.
* Bundling discounts for drivers who have homeowners or other types of insurance with the same carrier.

Your free auto insurance quotes could save you a lot of money. Get the discounts you want and a policy easily within your budget. Visit www.freeinsurancerates.org today.

Sponsored content provided by FreeInsuranceRates.org. Copyright ARAnet, Inc.
READ MORE - Bwheel : The easy way to save on auto insurance

Bwheel : Higher Limits - But Less Leeway

Eric Peters

The good news is many states are raising their highway speed limits to the almost-fair. In my home state of Virginia, for example, many rural highway limits will go "up" to 70 mph this July. I put "up" in quotes because the new 70 mph limit, while higher than the previous 65 mph limit, is exactly the same (or slightly less) than the speed limit was way back in the early 1970s - before Nixon gave us the 55 mph National Maximum Speed Limit law that stayed on the books for the next 20-plus years.

So, we're almost back to where we were a generation ago. That's the good news. The bad news is that with these new limits comes much more aggressive enforcement. 70 mph means 70 mph. Not 75 mph. No more cushion of 5-10 mph or so, which used to be the unspoken gentlemen's agreement during the Drive 55 (and later, 65) era.

So, the net effect may be that while the legal limit is higher, actual road speeds will be lower. Or at least, you'll be more likely to get a ticket if you drive at speeds that used to be unofficially ok, even if technically illegal.

I know a few cops, including a state trooper, and they've told me that the deal is off. If you drive more than a couple of miles-per-hour faster than the new, "higher" limits, you can expect to be on the receiving end of a piece of payin' paper. But it's not out of vengefulness. It's opportunism, plain and simple.

The upticked limits have been in the pipeline for a while. It takes years to get something like this done. Public resentment of artificially low limits required time to fester to a boiling point sufficient to overcome decades of "speed kills" propaganda and give us an actual bill that might eventually become a law. Meanwhile, the economy tanked - and with it, tax revenues. State and local governments are broke or staring down "painful" (to the bureaucrats and tax-feeders) cutbacks. To keep the gravy train running, more "revenue" needs to be raised. But since overt taxes are politically unthinkable right now, more subtle means of extracting the necessary lucre are necessary.

Enter the Motorists Tax. The beauty of it (again, from the bureaucrats' point-of-view) is that it has a moralizing element to it. They will croon about safety. And of the need for "zero tolerance" of "dangerous speeders."

Since most people have completely forgotten that speed limits 40 years ago were higher than they are today, this will likely sell. Driving 70 mph will be portrayed as Autobahn-like, while driving any faster than 70 will be denounced as the equivalent of running down small children with an SUV. It will not matter that 70-ish mph has been the de facto, routine, average speed of most cars on most highways for years, without excessive carnage or mayhem (indeed, the fact is accident/fatality rates have been trending downward - to a great extent because modern cars are vastly more safe to be in if you do crash and inherently less likely to crash in the first place thanks to accident-avoidance technology such as stability control and ABS). Nor will it matter that the new "higher" limits merely mean that the legal speed limit now roughly comports more closely with the natural flow of traffic.

What will matter is that the revenuers now have a new excuse to pick our pockets. In the past, the really egregious tickets - 62 in a 55, say - were hard to support because they were so obviously unjust. Many judges tossed such tickets out. Everyone saw through it, knew it was absurd. But the memory of a time when American highways were posted at 70-75 mph and it was routine to travel at 80-plus without too much worry about being hassled by cops is now so dim and largely forgotten that bringing back 70 seems like a radical - even reckless - thing. Such blazing, daredevil speed!

It is presented as the outer threshold of sanity. And thus, any farther is clearly out of bounds. So, be forewarned - and adjust your pace to the new reality. 70 means 70 (unless you've been snarky enough to buy a good radar detector).

Otherwise, expect no mercy. The gentlemen's understanding between cops and motorists is torn asunder. The cushion is no more. Drive accordingly.
READ MORE - Bwheel : Higher Limits - But Less Leeway

Reviewing the 2010 Infiniti EX35

Wednesday, April 28, 2010

Eric Peters
More and more people are "crossing over" to crossovers from traditional SUVs. These car-based wagons are easier on gas than a truck-based SUV, handle more like a regular car - but are roomier inside and can usually carry more stuff than a regular car. Almost all of them have one big downside, however - if you're a performance driving enthusiast.

That downside is that most are based on a front-wheel-drive layout, usually with an all-wheel-drive system of some kind available optionally. Nothing wrong with that, if you mainly want better traction in the wet and snow. But if you want rear wheel drive (with a RWD-based AWD system) and superior RWD handling and balance - you're pretty much out of luck. One of the handful of exceptions to this rule is Infiniti's rear-drive-based EX35

WHAT IT IS

The EX35 is a medium-small, five-door hatchback luxury-sportwagon with two rows of seating and a cargo area behind that - aka, a "crossover" - that differs from others like it mainly in being built on a rear-wheel-drive (instead of front-wheel-drive) layout. It offers performance/handling closer to a RWD sport sedan than other otherwise similar crossover wagons.

WHAT'S NEW

The EX35 was introduced for 2009 as a brand-new model so there are only a few tweaks here and there for 2010. Prices start at $33,800 for the base RWD version and run to $37,400 for a top-of-the-line Journey version with AWD.

WHAT'S GOOD

Rear wheel drive layout delivers sportier driving feel than front-drive-based crossovers. Standard V-6 is as strong as some V-8s. Very quick; very sharp reflexes. More fun to drive than a BMW X3 and doesn't cost nearly as much as the BMW does.

WHAT'S NOT SO GOOD

No manual transmission option - a shame given the otherwise unimpeachable performance vehicle bona fides the EX brings to the table.

ENGINES & PERFORMANCE

The EX comes standard with a 297 hp 3.5 liter V-6 and five-speed automatic transmission - period. The EX's V-6 is one of the strongest standard (and even optional) engines available in a vehicle in this class/price range. 0-60 happens in about 6.3 seconds. These stats (297 hp; 0-60 in just over six seconds) beat the one competitor that's most similar to the EX in layout, the BMW X3.

Like the Infiniti, the BMW X3 is based on a rear-drive (3-series sedan) layout. But its standard 3 liter straight six is considerably less potent (260 hp, or almost 40 less than the Infiniti brings to the table) and its price tag ($39,700) is almost six grand higher to start. The one advantage the BMW does have, as far as performance stuff goes, is that it comes standard with a six speed manual transmission.

The Infiniti is automatic-only. The BMW also comes standard with AWD (which partially justifies its higher price point). Gas mileage for the RWD version of the EX35 is 17 city, 24 highway - slightly better than the heavier, less powerful X3 (16 city, 23 highway).

DRIVING IMPRESSIONS

The difference in agility between the EX35 and other FWD/AWD crossovers and truck-based SUVs is apparent as soon as you start driving the thing faster than the (under)posted speed limit, in curves especially. It's not nose-heavy like so any FWD-based crossovers so it doesn't dive and plow and understeer unhappily - with the electronic traction/stability control cutting in constantly as it tries to make up for the design deficiency - in a performance context - of the FWD layout. Arc the steering wheel as appropriate to suit your line, then bully your way through putting power to the rear - as the Motor Gods intended.

And with almost 40 hp more than its nearest SUV/crossover competition (the BMW X3) it can launch itself out of those corners - and down the straightaways - with far greater authority, too. The 3.5 liter V-6 is strong enough to push you back in your seat - and makes passing slo-mo's a real pleasure. Just punch it - and you're gone.

Though it would be nice to have the option, at least, of a six-speed manual in this thing, the abundant power (as well as the excellent programming Infiniti has dialed into the standard automatic) make it a lot more fun to drive than the manual-equipped BMW X3.

High speed stability is exceptional, too - and that is something that's often lacking in closer-to-SUV crossovers like the X3. (It may just be why BMW fits the X3 with not-so-high-speed H-rated/130 mph maximum tires vs. the EX's 168 mph W-rated tires.)

If there's a downside, it's that the EX eggs you on to drive it fast and hard - which does an OJ on the thing's "best case" gas mileage. Run the EX35 hard, as it likes to be driven, and you can expect to get a real world average that's close to 15-16 mpg.

It also wants premium unleaded - so your gas costs will be higher than vehicles that are happy on regular or mid-grade.

RWD versions of the EX35 are slightly quicker and more athletic feeling because they weigh slightly less - and because there's less parastic drag through the drivetrain. You can also make the rear tires screech (traction control off) if that's your thing. Either way, both versions of the EX are as quick - or quicker - than an early-mid 1990s V-8 powered Mustang GT.

Other factors that affect handling feel/cornering prowess are ride height and weight. The EX35 sits much lower to the pavement than the X3, with only 6.5 inches of clearance vs. the BMW's 8 inches. That is a significant difference you really can feel in a high-speed turn. The AWD X3 is also around 200 pounds heavier than the RWD EX35 (3,754 lbs. vs. 4,012 for the BMW). Combined with the almost 40 hp deficit, this makes the X3 feel sluggish compared with the athletic Infiniti - once again, despite the BMW's available manual transmission.

STYLING & UTILITY

The EX looks like what it is - a wagonized version of the G35 sedan. The front clip is very similar, for example.

The interior layout of the EX is also similar to the way the G35's laid out. It is much less SUV (or even crossover) like and more sport sedan-like - with a curving "double wave" dash that flows into the door panels and recessed LCD display for the GPS in the center stack. It is finished with black lacquer and aluminum trim plates or - optionally - wood veneer inserts. It's what you might cll "swank-tech." The stats say it will seat five but realistically, this is a four-passenger vehicle - as are others in the segment, including the X3.

One area where the EX is objectively weak relative to competitors like the BMW X3 is cargo capacity. Behind the rear seats, there's only about 19 cubic feet vs. the BMW's 30 cubic feet.

Rear seat accommodations are a mixed bag. Taller torso riders will appreciate the extra headroom (38.4 inches for the EX vs. 37.8 for the X3). But if they have long legs, they will be less happy in the EX - which has just 28.5 inches of legroom vs. 35.8 n the BMW.

QUALITY & SAFETY

Infiniti vehicles have a high-end feel to them, not just a high-end brand name. Though several models are either based on or share major components such as platforms and engines with less prestigious Nissan-branded models, Infiniti does a very effective job of putting distance between them - and not just price-wise.

The base EX, for example, comes with a high level of standard amenities, including automatic climate control, electric sunroof, premium stereo with factory satellite radio hook-up, 17 inch alloy wheels and Infiniti's unique self-healing paint. The finish has high-elastic resins that let it expand to fill in small scratches without ever needing to visit a body shop - or get out the buffing compound.

With a starting price point of $33,800 the EX is also considerably less expensive than its most direct competitor, the BMW X3 ($39,700).

If the definition of "quality" includes giving you equivalent or better features and equipment than competitors for less money than they are charging, then the EX35 is certainly a high-quality vehicle.

Lots of safety equipment - both built-in crashworthiness and active accident-avoidance features - is a given on a vehicle such as the EX35. But in addition to the things you'd find in other similar in price vehicle, such as high-capacity disc brakes with ABS, side-impact and curtain air bags, traction and stability control, the EX35 goes up another notch with an available full perimeter Around View camera system that gives you a 360 degree bird's eye look around the entire vehicle, as if you were floating 10 feet above it. It works when you're moving forward as well as backing up, too - and makes it almost impossible to not notice something that you might otherwise bump into or drive over. You can change the view, too, to show the rear wheels relative to the curb - very helpful in parallel parking and could save you some scuffed (and expensive) rims, too.

In addition to all that, the EX also offers an optional Lane Departure Warning that beeps at you if you wander too near the double yellow line in the road. But be advised the system can be annoying. Its default setting is "always on" - meaning its on whenever you first get in/start the vehicle. You have to manually turn it off every time you start the car if you want to nix the relentless beeping. That I could live without.

THE BOTTOM LINE

The EX35 offers a tempting package that should appeal to the serious enthusiast driver who wants some utility but real-deal performance and handling capability, too.

Add the optional AWD system and you can probably make it into the office on those handful of snow days when AWD would come in handy, too. And the rest of the time? You'll be showing your bumper to every other small SUV/crossover on the road.
READ MORE - Reviewing the 2010 Infiniti EX35

Is Big Brother your backseat spy?

Is the latest auto technology a threat to your privacy?

A strange question at first glance, perhaps, but it's no coincidence so many new-car commercials show a solitary driver escaping civilization along some lonesome desert, mountain or prairie road.

Americans love cars and one of the things they treasure most is the privacy they provide.

But they also love convenience. And that clash promises to bring strife to Americans' love affair with the automobile: Convenience versus privacy.

"What is a car? The freedom on an open road to do as you please," says Beth Givens, founder and director of the Privacy Rights Clearinghouse. Larry Ponemon, founder and chairman of the Ponemon Institute, which advises businesses and the government on privacy and ethical information management, agrees. "It's a sacred place where we can sing, we can make private phone calls. For the most part people don't worry about their privacy when they're in the car -- they're home."

But as technological gizmos such as global positioning systems (GPS) can make cars physically safer and more convenient, they can make driving less safe from a privacy perspective.

"The freedom to travel is one of the most fundamental freedoms in a democratic society, and that's something you should be able to do without your every move being tracked," says Jay Stanley, communications director of the technology and liberty program of the American Civil Liberties Union.

Privacy advocates acknowledge the benefits of auto technology while cautioning about their potential for allowing (an expected) freedom sting. Here's how some of today's electronic auto gadgets could be used to invade your privacy:

The black box

Nearly everyone knows about flight data recorders on airplanes, but news to many consumers is that most newer cars have a similar device. These black boxes (AKA event data recorders or crash data recorders) can capture vehicle speed, brake action, shift position, engine speed, change of speed over time, airbag deployment, seatbelt use and other data just before or after a crash.

On the pro side, black boxes accelerate safety by providing information experts use to improve cars and roads. Also, simple knowledge about the device may be enough to get some people to think thrice about risky driving moves.

What frustrates privacy advocates most is this: "All of a sudden you're involved in a situation with your car and you didn't know it was really spying on you," Givens says, noting that attorneys and insurance companies are well aware of the data and already are using it in legislation.

"Some car safety people are pushing for all cars to be equipped with [black boxes]," notes Richard M. Smith, a privacy and security consultant. Smith explains that adding the devices is "not a big deal" from either a technical or financial standpoint. "It's really a crapshoot; it's very unclear who this helps," he says, pointing out that ownership of the data and how it's interpreted (or misinterpreted) are potential issues.

Money savings may convince consumers to give up a little privacy. Through a Minnesota pilot program, some insurance policyholders of the Progressive Casualty Insurance Co., allow their driving habits to be tracked.

The tracking device, which spokesman William Perry says doesn't actually involve a black box, acts like one by recording mileage, speed and time of day. Customers willing to share that information can save 5 to 25 percent off the cost of their next policy. It's all in the name of accurate pricing, Perry explains.

Radio frequency ID chips

RFID chips allow everyday objects to "talk" to each other.

"I'm very concerned about expansion of radio frequency ID in cars," Givens says. "We could literally be tracked everywhere we drive." Highway systems are equipped with RFID signal readers, and tire manufacturers have started implanting chips in tires to help spot failures and track tires for recall purposes.

Toll booth speed pass systems also incorporate the technology and can record a person's whereabouts. "Of course, 99 percent of the time it doesn't really matter," says ACLU's Stanley. "It becomes another data point on that individual. But on rare occasions it could matter to you."

And sufficient privacy protections haven't yet been put in place, he adds.

Secondary use of RFID data concerns Smith, too. One example of "feature creeper" is in the Orlando, Fla., area, where, beginning in May 2005, roadside RFID readers will trace the travel time of individual cars, creating an average trip time that can be communicated to other drivers.

"Most people just think about the benefits of having [speed pass]," Givens says. But driver data could be connected to other records -- and the data have already been used in divorce and child custody disputes. Not to mention, the data also could be used to nab individuals for speeding.

Global positioning systems

Divorce attorneys and private detectives wouldn't mind getting their hands on navigational system records, either. What better way to prove or disprove a spouse's location? Subscribers to GPS technology services have access to maps and driving directions as needed, and companies like OnStar also offer stolen vehicle and roadside assistance. OnStar call centers can even listen in on a car, should it be stolen or the driver needs help.

"Most people think that this is an excellent technology and it's worth money to pay for it," says Ponemon. "But you're basically providing information on where you are at any point in time. In safe hands that information is probably okay for each of us, (but) it can be used against people who may not want to reveal where they are."

"They kind of control your car," Smith says, noting that companies like OnStar have no particular reason to spy on their customers, but in some cases they have been required -- under subpoena -- to provide that information." OnStar's privacy policy is upfront about stating that information will be used to respond to regulatory and legal requirements. In some cases, drivers don't even know they're being tracked through GPS. Law enforcement officials have gotten warrants to attach GPS devices to the cars of suspects, Givens says. While many might find that a desirable feature, a stalker could use GPS to keep tabs on a victim.

Some rental car companies have also used the technology, charging customers additional fees for speeding or exceeding certain boundaries. California legislation prohibits companies from using GPS without the customer's consent, and in Connecticut a court ruled that one rental car company's speeding fines were illegal. But experts say the issue isn't closed.

Risks and rewards

"There's no absolute right to privacy," Ponemon cautions. "None of this information, when it's collected, is absolutely protected."

And Givens adds, "The problem is that there will always be other uses found for [the data]."

And if the day comes where drivers rely too much on auto gizmos, a technology failure could cause havoc. As could an outright technology shutdown; the Bush administration has recently announced that the nation's GPS infrastructure could be turned off in the event of an attack, since terrorists could tap into the systems.

"I'd be afraid of technology that shuts my car off," Ponemon says, imagining that he's on a highway when someone pushes a button that could cause his car, which may be relying too much on technology-based systems, to crash.

Still, privacy advocates recognize the plus side of technologies that improve safety and enhance the driver's experience. "I think that the benefits outweigh the costs and the risk, but there need to be privacy and security safeguards," Ponemon says.

Stanley adds, "Most technologies have good uses and we want to be able to [use them] without worrying about them being used against us."
READ MORE - Is Big Brother your backseat spy?

King Of The Road : The Bamboozled American Driver

Eric Peters  
Just the other day I saw a TV commercial for the 2011 Infiniti M56. It has a 420 hp 5.6 liter V-8 engine. It can reach 60 mph in about 5 seconds and will run to more than 150 mph, flat out. I know, it makes me excited too.

But how many of the middle-aged urban/suburban manager/professional types who buy a car like this will ever drive it faster than 100? Or even 90? And how often will they do even that? Even the young and eager can't make use of such power. See what happens if you drive 100 mph (or faster) for any length of time in the U.S. I don't like it, either - but it's the reality.

How often do you see people (teenagers excepted) blasting 0-60 as fast as the car can go? Not me. I drive a lot and all over the country and what I see much more often is cars - including 400 hp cars like the M56 - easing away from lights just like the minivan in the next lane. The cars all pretty much grouped together, none going much faster than the others - and all of them going pretty slow. Maybe 10 mph or so over the posted limit. If there's no cop around. That's about it.

How often do you see a car doing 0-60 in 5 seconds? Or running 20 or more mph faster than surrounding traffic. It happens, yes. But it's rare - and when it does happen it's usually a kid in a souped-up Mitsubishi with a huge wing on the trunk, not a 40-year-old businessman in a $57,000 Infiniti (or Benz or whatever).

In this country, a 400 hp car is as useless as a jet ski in the Mojave. We can't drive really fast (much over 80) for any length of time, at least, because if we do, we will be roughly treated by the police - then the courts - and then by the DMV and the insurance cartels.

Adults - who are the only people in a position to buy a car like the $57,000 M56 - know this. They may have a teenaged son or daughter who would kill to drive the M56 to the fullest extent of its capability (and may just do it) but the adult owner won't because he's aware of the consequences or is just too old for that kind of stuff. Reality check. It sucks, but it's the truth.

Equally true: A modern fule-injected 200 hp V-6 will get you to 100 without breaking a sweat - and to 80 or so (about the fastest we can realistically drive here for any length of time) and maintain it, easily. And it wouldn't get 16 mpg (or cost $57k) like the 420 hp M56 does.

But, we've been convinced by the marketing and PR wizards that a V-8 more powerful than Ferrari V-12s were in the '80s is an absolute Essential - or at least, very desirable - even if we have neither the inclination nor the opportunity to ever actually use two-thirds of that capability.

Current luxury cars are more juiced up than Arnold Schwarzennegger during his Mr. Olympia days - and like him, built mostly for show-only.

In Europe (Germany especially) really powerful cars do get used, so it makes some sense. But there's something symptomatically American about millions of 300 and 400 hp luxury cars loafing along at 64 mph - their engines burbling, their chrome plated 20 inch rims spinning... like Arnold flexing his biceps, but never actually doing anything with them.

Virtually all current-year luxury cars are really sports cars. They have sharply raked windshields and low-cut rooflines, hold-you-tight-bucket seats with floor (and paddle) shifters and consoles and huge hooded gauge clusters with tachometers and 8,000 RPM redlines. They ride on 18, 19 and 20-inch light-alloy wheels with tires that have sidewalls as skinny and hard as the 20-year-old flatbelly who teaches aerobics at the gym. Which is lovely, if you do track days - or drive on public roads like you do on track days.

But 95 percent of the people who drive these cars, don't. As Bob Dole once said: You know it. I know it. The American people know it. But they don't care. They willingly pay fifty or sixty grand to cram their not-so-flexible, not-so-young-anymore backsides into a tight-fitting, hard-riding sports car with four doors and pay $300 a pop for 150 mph-rated tires that never see the high side of 80 - in order that they may feel youthful and virile and whatever-else, as conditioned into their heads by the PR maestros who make it so.

My father in law drives a Cadillac Sedan de Ville from the early 1990s - the era when Cadillac still built luxury cars. It does not have bucket seats. It has flat, three-across bench seats. They give when you sit down - and are perfect for 15 hour drives to Vegas. A pull-down column-shifter controls an automatic that is automatic. It does not require or expect you to tap paddle shifters or engage "sport" mode. There is no "sport" mode. Its job is to transition between gears without the driver or passengers noticing or feeling anything. That was the whole object of the exercise, you see.

It has pop-on (and off) wire wheel covers on 15 inch rims - with smooth-riding all-season radials wrapped around 'em. The suspension is soft. You don't feel potholes. The steering is one-finger effortless - and the car is incredibly comfortable.

True, it doesn't "handle" in the way that almost all modern car reviewers require for their approval. But it wasn't meant to. What it was meant to do is glides along, smoothly and quietly - relaxation in motion. Which is what used to be what luxury meant. I miss it. Don't you?

On the other end of the scale, we have economy car buyers who don't think it's unreasonable to expect the automakers to produce subcompacts that can take a T-bone impact at 60 mph like a 5,000 pound S-Class Benz, yet also knock down 40 MPGs but still do 0-60 in less than 8 seconds; that feature GPS, power windows and locks, Bluetooth wireless - and still be priced under $15k.

Economy cars - the real deal - can't be sold here. At least, not recently. Remember the three-cylinder Geo Metro? That was an economy car. It got better gas mileage (50-plus MPGs) than a 2010 Prius - and it cost half as much. Naturally, no one bought it.

People also snicker at 40 mpg diesel tanks like the old Benz 300D. Too slow. Not "sporty" enough. Meanwhile, people bitch about $3 gas. Meanwhile, millions of hausfraus putter around suburbia in 5,000 lb. 4WD SUVs and AWD "crossovers" that will live their entire lives on the tarmac. Am I the only one left who can see the man behind the curtain?

Go back 25 years or so and the only people who drive 4WDs were country people or working people who needed them and actually used them. All-wheel-drive was nonexistent, but all of a sudden, almost every new car has it or offers it. Millions of car buyers suddenly believe they've just got to have it.

The PR flacks created a need - and the industry is eager to fulfill that need. It's capitalism, of course. But that doesn't mean it's smart.
READ MORE - King Of The Road : The Bamboozled American Driver

 
 
 

Link

Followers